ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Orville (2017)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi on Television from 2011 to 2020
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adrianne looks good in a little black dress... Very Happy



It may be a little unfair to compare an sf tv series to the Guardians of the Galaxy, as they are rather different beasts. Episode five seemed pretty strong; Seth and Charlize have history together, as they starred in his "A Million Ways to Die in the West" - which also had a time travelling aspect in a cameo. Charlize still looks good to me at 42; one could say she deserves a medal for that, and I'd be glad to give her one.

Having a time traveller from the future worked pretty well and was more original than some previous ideas, though there was a slight echo of the film "Millennium" perhaps. However, the idea that just destroying the time-gate would put everything right seemed a bit too simple...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Custer wrote:
It may be a little unfair to compare an sf tv series to the Guardians of the Galaxy, as they are rather different beasts.

I'd have to say they're more alike than different.

Both are energetic, light-hearted science fiction which attempts to blend dazzling special effects with both action and humor.

My contention is that The Orville fails to offer humorous moments that are clever enough to justify the occasional silliness amidst the serious drama. It's a tricky balance, and when it isn't done well it's like an actor suddenly breaking the fourth wall by winking at the audience.

Frankly, Guardians of the Galaxy vol. 2 doesn't manage it as well as the previous film. That's why Wikipedia has this item in the "critical response" section of the article.

Owen Gleiberman of Variety called the film "an extravagant and witty follow-up, made with the same friendly virtuosic dazzle . . . and just obligatory enough to be too much of a good thing." He cautioned that "this time you can sense just how hard [Gunn] is working to entertain you. Maybe a little too hard."

My advice to Seth MacFarlane would be, "During rehearsals, try each joke out on the cast and crew. Use them like an audience. If they don't crack up, drop the joke. Nobody is going to miss jokes that aren't funny."

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mach7
Quantum Engineer


Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 341

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Might I respectfully disagree Bud.

I can't speak to the GotG movies. I haven't seen them.

And everyones take on entertainment is inherently personnel.

But,

I don't think "The Orville" is meant to truly be a comedy in the style of "The Family Guy" or "Ted". I think it's trying to be everyman's science fiction. We all use humor to some degree in everyday life, But real life isn't "Seinfeld".

The humor seems crude at times, but over all real. The Orville is not the Enterprise, it's not a flagship. Just a midlevel ship staffed with ordinary people reacting like ordinary people.

I agree the writing will need to step up a notch if I will continue to watch long term. So far the stories, while entertaining, are far too contrived, derivative, and clean. The notable exception so far being "About a Girl".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Based on your statements, it sounds like we actually agree about the nature and quality of The Orville.

We all heard that the series was "a spoof of Star Trek" before it premiered, but that turned out to be incorrect. It doesn't try to be a comedy, it just includes humorous moments that could be described as "irreverent".

However, I don't disagree that the humor "real".

A robot that thinks a good practical joke is to amputate a man's leg is pretty "over-the-top". The rest of the humor (which I agree is sometimes crude) needs to be funnier if they expect the audience to accept the way the narrative switches back and forth between serious and funny.

Otherwise the humor just seems like an unwanted interruption in a story which the viewer wants to take seriously.

My complaint with the humor is similar to the dissatisfaction we both have with the stories themselves — neither the humor nor the stories are as good as they should be. I'm not saying that humor shouldn't be included in this sci-fi series, I'm just saying that humor which is unsuccessful isn't a plus.

It's a minus, an unfortunate interruption in our "suspension of disbelief".

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mach7
Quantum Engineer


Joined: 23 Apr 2015
Posts: 341

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
Based on your statements, it sounds like we actually agree about the nature and quality of The Orville.

My complaint with the humor is similar to the dissatisfaction we both have with the stories themselves — neither the humor nor the stories are as good as they should be. I'm not saying that humor shouldn't be included in this sci-fi series, I'm just saying that humor which is unsuccessful isn't a plus.

It's a minus, an unfortunate interruption in our "suspension of disbelief".

I can't disagree with this, all I can say is so far it's working enough for me to keep coming back. The show, while better than many at the 5 episode point, still has room to grow and improve.

I will say that the leg amputation bit worked for me. It was almost pythonesqe, and in the show it has no lasting implications. I admit to laughing when Gordon reports to the bridge with a half formed leg. A nice sight gag.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mach7 wrote:
The show, while better than many at the 5 episode point, still has room to grow and improve.

I will say that the leg amputation bit worked for me. It was almost pythonesqe, and in the show it has no lasting implications. I admit to laughing when Gordon reports to the bridge with a half formed leg. A nice sight gag.

Sir, I think we've come to a consensus. Very Happy

I mentioned the amputation joke only to counter your statement about the humor being "real" — aka "not like sitcoms". But the joke itself did have some funny aspects. In fact, I'd judge that whole gag to one of the more successful examples of the show's humor, despite the gruesome initial scene of the poor guy waking up with one foot in the grave! Shocked

I mean . . . in the ceiling.

But we certainly agree that the show is worth sticking with for the time being, even though it "still has room to grow and improve".

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote




Time for another picture, probably - and with Charlize Theron involved, who could complain? Hey, it was either this one or the lift, er, elevator, scene.

Even the victim eventually agreed that Isaac's attempt at a practical joke was a good one... with the technology involved, there was no pain or lasting damage. And his joke on Isaac earlier, adding "Mr Potato Head" pieces to Isaac's head while he was recharging, was very funny.
Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

Okay, guys, ya got me!

I guess I've been too though on the humor in The Orville. It certainly isn't ALL bad.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I must say that I was very impressed with the latest, seventh episode. They took the old Star Trek idea of visiting a planet with uncanny similarities to Earth, and did something that comments strongly on life as we know it today.

With the whole populace "voting" on videos taken on phones and uploaded to (the local equivalent of) YouTube, giving positive or negative feedback on, say, someone fooling around dancing with a statue or failing to give up their seat on the bus to a pregnant woman, and people going on chat shows to try to apologise or justify their actions, it all seemed very close to home - though, of course, with a twist. Thinking afterwards, I tentatively entitled the episode "Planet of the Social Media" - but later I amended that to "Planet of the Apps."

One minor change I would have made would have been to change the voting system so that positive votes counted as well as negative votes - instead of 10,000,000 negative votes closing the contest, surely the positive votes should have been subtracted from that, even if that lowered the target figure? It would have made the last-minute attempts from Isaac to affect the voting more direct and believable...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

The weakest part of that episode was the way the "away team" went down to the planet so poorly prepared — which result in near disaster. They had no idea how that wacky society worked!

And the scene where one the characters said, "What's money?" before they went down was pretty silly. Just how far into the future does this show take place? Money, in one form or another has been around for thousands of years! That's a little saying, "What are books?"

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Sat Mar 10, 2018 2:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bud Brewster wrote:
The weakest part of that episode was the way the "away team" went down to the planet so poorly prepared — which result in near disaster. They had no idea how that wacky society worked!

And the scene where one the characters said, "What's money?" before they went down was pretty silly. Just how far into the future does this show take place? Money, in one form or another has been around for thousands of years! That's a little saying, "What are books?"

The weakest part was sending an incompetent crewman, who not only can't follow orders, but actively disobeys the orders of a superior officer. Then, even after having the seriousness of the situation hammered into his head, still acts like a jackass. I was hoping that he would get lobotomized!

Also you don't send a crewman that can easily be discovered as an alien unless you absolutely have to. At least in "Star Trek" they would temporally surgically alter their appearance to match the population.

And just what were those Scientist putting in their reports, where the Orville landing party was clueless about the situation. Or was it the Admiralty that was incompetent?

The money thing is a carryover from G.R.'s NextGen socialist Utopia. None of the NextGen shows have been able to explain how that system could work, that's why DS9 came up with the gold pressed latinum (I had to lookup what it was called). But seeing as you have seen them watching old TV shows, and playing games set in historic periods, it doesn't seem likely that they wouldn't know what money is, if only from history class.

But I did think that the society was well thought out, and frighteningly possible.

David.
Back to top
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2944
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or perhaps the "money" line was meant to be sacastic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17062
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gord Green wrote:
Or perhaps the "money" line was meant to be sacastic.

You're being kind, Gord, but it wasn't played like sarcasm. After the question was asked ("What's money?") it was given a straight answer, and the person who asked the question looked puzzled by the concept.

To me that scene was one of the many elements of this story (and this series) which mocks Star Trek in some ways, while making Star Trek look much more intelligent by comparison. (See: Krel's scathing-but-well-deserved criticism above.) Rolling Eyes

Maybe this should be my next book! Laughing



_______
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:35 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Custer
Space Sector Commander


Joined: 22 Aug 2015
Posts: 932
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Mr Spock has been known to disguise his pointy ears under a woolly hat... taking someone super-strong along could have been useful. But those two researchers must have done enough research during their time there to be a bit more alert on public transport, one would have thought. And it was surprisingly easy to get those up-down badges on the black market!

The money thing was a bit simplistic. One might assume that our intrepid voyagers were so used to everything being done electronically, that the idea of cash didn't occur to them. After all, doesn't Amazon today have some sort of project where you just go into their shop, pick stuff up, and walk out with it, with the cost of your acquisitions just coming straight from your credit card...?

Anyway, it was still a strong, thought-provoking and timely episode.
Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Custer wrote:
The money thing was a bit simplistic. One might assume that our intrepid voyagers were so used to everything being done electronically, that the idea of cash didn't occur to them. After all, doesn't Amazon today have some sort of project where you just go into their shop, pick stuff up, and walk out with it, with the cost of your acquisitions just coming straight from your credit card...?

The problem with that is that, is this is an interstellar civilization. The idea of your personal accounts following a person around the galaxy instantly is a bit difficult to take. You could very well leave a planet before your accounts could catch up to you. For it to work, you would need a fantastically fast, cheap to use and broad FTL data system. Some type of money would still be needed to open a local account.

But I am willing to bet that they didn't have this in mind. The show is suppose to take place in a socialist utopia like ST:TNG, and so no money is needed.

David.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi on Television from 2011 to 2020 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 4 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group