ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forbidden Planet (1956)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 63, 64, 65 ... 141, 142, 143  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17104
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

With all due respect, Eadie, Gord is right.

The photo of the young man waring a replica of the FP uniform is not one of the 12" action figures sold by Bob's Toy Factory. Notice the oversized weave of the fabric in the uniform worn by the action figure, cause by the fact that camera was close to the fabric, thereby showing the weave of the cloth.

The young man's uniform, however, has no visible weave because it's too small to see, since the photo of the man was taken from several feet away.

And, of course, there's the obvious fact that the face is real, not a plastic doll. Very Happy


Gord Green wrote:
Last night I re-watched the workprint of FORBIDDEN PLANET that the Barron's used to score the film and was struck by how well then excised scenes could be digitaly restored to a new copy of the film.

Gord, I’m still puzzled by your belief that any scene taken from that washed out, blurry old 16mm work print (with scratchy, monaural sound) could be “restored” and digitally added the beautiful print used for the current Blu-ray of Forbidden Planet!

How could any kind of “restoration” take a scene like the one below (a screen shot from the deleted scenes on my Blu-ray) —



— and somehow make it look REMOTELY like this screen shot from the actually movie ?



I respectfully submit, sir, that we can't "restore" something that looked like crap to start with! Shocked

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:18 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1876

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's funny that this costume issue came up. When I was looking at the costume photos yesterday, the thought that popped into my head was, "Those boots he's wearing make him look like an action figure." Very Happy
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was going to buy one of the caps for the badge.

Gord Green wrote:



But then I read that the badge was curved, not flat.

Richard Coyle has said that the blaster pistol is based off of his copy. They used the undersized muzzle tips that were on his first replicas. He said that the company that he used to make the muzzle tips for him made them undersized, and he had too many to trash. He had larger tips made when the original order ran out.



This blaster pistol also has an incorrect trigger. They use a large red button that the original doesn't have.

David.


Last edited by Krel on Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

orzel-w wrote:
It's funny that this costume issue came up. When I was looking at the costume photos yesterday, the thought that popped into my head was, "Those boots he's wearing make him look like an action figure." Very Happy

I read somewhere, years ago, that the boots used in the movie, were cut-down riding boots.

David.
Back to top
Gord Green
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 06 Oct 2014
Posts: 2944
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BUD WROTE;
Quote:
Gord, I’m still puzzled by your belief that any scene taken from that washed out, blurry old 16mm work print (with scratchy, monaural sound) could be “restored” and digitally added the beautiful print used for the current Blu-ray of Forbidden Planet!


With all due respect Sir that is EXACTLY what digital restoration ....or should I say CGI enhancement does. All the scenes I refered to have pristine reference available for the backgrounds and subject matter (actors). All are relatively brief. The shipboard and night exterior shots are also limited in color saturation and ALL can be cgi enhanced with cleaned up sound. We're talking about less then ten minutes in screen time.

I would never suggest that this would replace the present version, but could make an "alternate" version with all original material that was excised and sloppily edited from the start.

If Lucas could digitally keep changing his STAR WARS films this would be small by comparison. Unlike the STAR WARS films this would be restoring original elements of the story, not changing anything from what was originaly shot.

I would have to say, however, this would never really happen because there is no money to be made from it. Unlike STAR WARS there is little profit in this project.....but I still think it would be great!

_________________
There comes a time, thief, when gold loses its lustre, and the gems cease to sparkle, and the throne room becomes a prison; and all that is left is a father's love for his child.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17104
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

________________________________

My apologies. The cause of my confusion is your use of the words "digitally restored" and "CGI enhancement".

I thought you wanted to "fix up" (restore) those fuzzy scenes in the work print.

What you really mean is a CGI recreation of each scene, starting from scratch and rendering them as pure computer generated images, with no attempt made to "restore" the 16mm film images.

The deleted scenes would, as you implied, only be used as references for the complete recreation of each scene, imitating as closely as possible what was photographed for the movie.

Sort of like what an artist does when he has a model pose for a portrait. Very Happy

And yes, all the other shots currently in the movie would serve as vital references for details, like the color and texture and lightning, since the deleted scenes are what our late friend Bulldogtrekker used to call "a hot mess". Very Happy

Gord, I would love to see that done too! I'm sure they could make Forbidden Planet 3D as well! I love the way 3D has become so reliable and easy to watch. I don't know what the difference is between 3D and "real 3D" but I've yet to see one that was very impressive.

Maybe someday all this will become inexpensive enough to make it possible.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maurice
Mission Specialist


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 485
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The amount of CGI work it would take to rez-up that deleted footage would be expensive and likely unconvincing. The issue with digital cleanup is how much visual information is there to work from, and these surviving elements are pretty mushy. I guess one could try something like CGI Leia in Rogue One, but she''s only on screen for a single shot and one word and she looks awful.
_________________
* * *
"The absence of limitations is the enemy of art."
― Orson Welles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1876

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maurice wrote:
I guess one could try something like CGI Leia in Rogue One, but she''s only on screen for a single shot and one word and she looks awful.

Grand Moff Tarkin, on the other hand, had considerably more screen time, and looked much more convincing.
_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maurice
Mission Specialist


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 485
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

orzel-w wrote:
Maurice wrote:
I guess one could try something like CGI Leia in Rogue One, but she''s only on screen for a single shot and one word and she looks awful.

Grand Moff Tarkin, on the other hand, had considerably more screen time, and looked much more convincing.

Tarkin was an actor with a CGI face mapped to him, and he still looks creepily unreal most of the time.
_________________
* * *
"The absence of limitations is the enemy of art."
― Orson Welles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17104
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

______________________________

Although the pants did tuck into the boots, they weren't as high as the boots in the picture above, so the loose pants legs gathered about four inches above the ankles.

_____________________


I didn't do a great job modifying the picture below, but the pants legs look a little more like the way they did in the movie.




As for the CGI recreation of the deleted scenes, Maurice made an interesting comment.


Maurice wrote:
The amount of CGI work it would take to rez-up that deleted footage would be expensive and likely unconvincing. The issue with digital cleanup is how much visual information is there to work from, and these surviving elements are pretty mushy.

As I mentioned, the goal would be to make pure CGI versions of the deleted scenes, using the crappy 16mm film only as a guide for the actions.

And as both Gord and I pointed out, the animators would have the entire film to use as references for details not discernible in the poor quality deleted scenes, like the interior of the ship, the texture of the uniforms, and the faces of the characters.

Gentlemen, let's not be shortsighted. Video games have gone from the laughably simple "Pong" to the incredibly realistic backgrounds and characters which make the FX in The Last Starfighter look closer to "Super Mario Brothers" than Jurassic Park.

Maybe I'm more impressed with the FX in War for the Planet of the Apes than you folks, but to me those apes look absolutely real, even in the closeups of Caesar and the other ape characters doing subtle expressions and effective acting.


War for the Planet of the Apes: Bad Ape Best Funny Moments


__________


My point, gentlemen, is that eventually we'll be able to do CGI people so convincingly they will look absolutely real. And when that happens, Forbidden Planet can be restored in a manner that will far exceed the way it looked at its own 1956 premiere!
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Tue Jul 24, 2018 10:47 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Krel
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maurice wrote:
Tarkin was an actor with a CGI face mapped to him, and he still looks creepily unreal most of the time.


What they reported, is that they chose an actor with a resemblance to Peter Cushing. They then put makeup appliances made from a life mask of Peter Cushing (The life mask was made for the movie "Top Secret") on the actor. They then used CGI to enhance the makeup appliances. That is why Tarkin looked so much better than Leia, and even with that, it was still a little off.

David.
Back to top
Eadie
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1695

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Girlfriends can be So temperamental [particularly every 28 days] (I know since I am one):



Yet so colorful:



I wonder how you males [I include Robby] cope?

Even while filming The Invisible Boy (1957) Robby had other duties:



And he has a new dance partner — Timmy's mom:





For a quite a while lately Robby was desperate for job, ANY job:



He's even been sending out old Movie World post cards:



His last job was for TCM hawking film noir movies:



And selling computer mouse pads:





Here is my niece. Hailey, in costume as movie power girl:



He currently resides in The Robots, Drones And Droids Retirement, (Oh My!) Community in South Florida:




This is deliberately large, It's beautiful:



Here is a list of the Just Imagine Jeanie stories:


_________________
____________
Art Should Comfort the Disturbed and Disturb the Comfortable.


Last edited by Eadie on Thu Jun 04, 2020 5:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robert (Butch) Day
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1437
Location: Arlington, WA USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even Robby has ine of those days!



The crew class B uniform modified for The Twilight Zone episodes Death Ship and On Thursday We Leave For Home:



This was taken at night along the Amazon river by a special camera. It shows a tree glowing by Rhadophyll.



Rhadophyll is a coined term about plants that naturally use a mixture of chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin where the chlorophyll is dominated by the other chemicals so the plant naturally is red in color. It's very unusual for this glow. That's still being studied.:



This is what's happened on Altair IV due to the star's emission spectrum according to a study by Victoria Meadows of the Virtual Planet Laboratory (VPL) at Caltech.



Did you know that the early Earth was purple? info at https://www.livescience.com/1398-early-earth-purple-study-suggests.html
_________________
Common Sense ISN'T Common
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17104
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eadie wrote:
This is deliberatly large, It's beautiful:


Eadie, I resized it and embedded a link to the large size version. You can do that too whenever you need to. But you have to have a 700 pixel version AND a big version in your Imgur account.

I've sent you guys detailed instructions by PM about to how to resize pictures on Imgur. It's really, really, really easy.

I swear to God. Really.

Please go back to that PM and follow the procedure. I sent screen grabs and detailed instructions. I'm sure you can figue it out.

Once you've got both the 700 pixel image AND the larger image on Imgur, just type this on your post.

[url=][img][/img][/url]

Then add the large image code and the 700 pixel image code this way:

[url=LARGE IMAGE CODE HERE][img]700 PIXEL IMAGE CODE HERE[/img][/url]

It's that easy!!! Very Happy

Images bigger than 700 pixels wide screw up the whole page of the thread by making it necessary to zoom out to see the entire image. That makes the text smaller and hard to read on all the post up and down the entire page! Shocked

We're not the only message board who asks its member to restrict their jpeg sizes. Trek BBS is a huge message board with thousands of members, and they make the same request about images sizes.

Remember when I posted their rule about this in the Buck Rogers thread?

If not, please click on the link above and read it again. To refresh your memory, here's what Trek BBS tells their members.

(The rule I've quoted below is located about halfway down the page at the Trek BBS link above).
____________________________

Picture size. Short guide: The smaller, the better. If it stretches the page, you've messed up. Also - if you're quoting someone who used pictures in their post, there's no need to repeat that picture in your thread.
____________________________

Please help me out, Eadie.
Cool
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:26 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maurice
Mission Specialist


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 485
Location: 3rd Rock

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Krel wrote:
Maurice wrote:
Tarkin was an actor with a CGI face mapped to him, and he still looks creepily unreal most of the time.

What they reported, is that they chose an actor with a resemblance to Peter Cushing. They then put makeup appliances made from a life mask of Peter Cushing (The life mask was made for the movie "Top Secret") on the actor. They then used CGI to enhance the makeup appliances. That is why Tarkin looked so much better than Leia, and even with that, it was still a little off.

David.

Not quite. The life cast of Cushing was used to build the CGI "digital makeup" face which was mapped to the Guy Henry's face. There was no physical appliance work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUIHzanm5Mk
_________________
* * *
"The absence of limitations is the enemy of art."
― Orson Welles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Sci-Fi Movies and Serials from 1950 to 1969 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 63, 64, 65 ... 141, 142, 143  Next
Page 64 of 143

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group