ALL SCI-FI Forum Index ALL SCI-FI
Nothin' but pure science fiction!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A Pitch For A New Star Trek TV Series

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Star Trek on Television
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bulldogtrekker
Space Sector Admiral


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1022
Location: Columbia,SC

PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:56 pm    Post subject: A Pitch For A New Star Trek TV Series Reply with quote

"Star Trek Beyond" Fan Creator Makes His Pitch For A New TV Series
by Michael Chang Gummelt, TrekMovie

Star Trek turns 50 next year. Yet it feels like it's at a nadir in its cultural importance. A movie every few years just isn't enough. .... Michael Chang Gummelt, creator of fan-made story Star Trek Beyond (coincidentally the same name chosen for the new Star Trek feature film) and owner of www.StarTrekBeyond.com, takes a look at the state of the franchise through the eyes of a fan creator in the below essay.



Fantastic fan productions are doing nearly as much to keep Trek relevant as the films (especially among longtime fans). But for Trek to fully regain its place as a forward-looking source of inspiration.... it must return to the medium that it was born from: TV.

I've written Trek before (the "Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force — video game) and had a series concept that I'd been toying with for 20 years. So I figured: why not? Write up my proposal, try to get it noticed and start a conversation amongst the fan community about what Star Trek should be in the future, and what that future might look like. I wrote a series bible, a 2-hour pilot, and 4 episodes. I named it "Star Trek Beyond" and put it all up on www.StarTrekBeyond.com. I sent it to any industry contacts I could find as well as Trek and sci-fi blogs. Of course, nobody showed much interest in it because everyone and their brother has a Star Trek idea to pitch.

More than a year later — by sheer happenstance — it turns out Paramount has chosen the same name for their next movie! Suddenly the website and concept are getting lots of attention! I've been getting tons of great feedback on the idea and even some industry insiders are responding to my e-mails now. And I'm certain Paramount is aware of it, too. Before the announcement, my website was getting maybe 50 hits a day, but the day that TrekMovie broke the news that the new movie was to be titled Star Trek Beyond, it jumped to 6,500.

So this is my chance — my chance to express why I think it's so important that Star Trek return to TV; why it needs to be reborn and modernized — in format, technology and in its themes.

Why TV?
Star Trek on film has always been different from Star Trek on TV, and necessarily so. Big-budget movies need to stick to a high adventure, short-story format for the masses. The audience wants to see the heroes win and get closure in the span of about 2 hours. The problems have to feel "big" to justify it being a movie instead of a TV episode. This has been a curse for Trek films since the beginning. If you make a movie with a story that feels too small (like, perhaps, "Insurrection"), then people complain that it feels like just another episode. But if you make the story too big (Earth/Galaxy/Timeline in peril), then fans complain that it doesn't feel like Star Trek anymore.

I can't think of another franchise with this peculiar dilemma. Star Trek is a TV series that has become so popular that the movies need to somehow simultaneously distance itself from the show while maintaining its spirit.

I love what Pegg has said he wants to do with Star Trek 3. It's the perfect direction for the movie series and it's sorely needed. We need to see this new incarnation be explorers, to have a sense of camaraderie like the Roddenberry/Coon crew had. We need to see them on a heady sci-fi adventure like TOS had, written by some of the best sci-fi writers of the time. We need to see the crew be friends, be competent and have fun.

The film that accomplished this best was "Star Trek IV: The One With The Whales." It was the first Trek film to really reach a wider audience. Maybe because it stripped away a lot of the trappings of Star Trek (the Enterprise, the future, Klingons, etc.) and brought the characters to our era, and then just had fun with its concept. It was a fish-out-of-water story (so to speak). It had high stakes (established concisely at the onset), was broadly appealing (relatable, funny) and felt like a Star Trek episode (time travel was nothing new to Trek). A neat hat trick, and certainly difficult to repeat.

I think Pegg may be onto something, though, when he mused about possibly taking a story people are familiar with (a heist, a western, etc.) and putting the Star Trek characters in it. This might actually be the secret sauce to finding a way to have your cake and eat it, too (and other mixed metaphors). Maybe he's busy writing the NuTrek equivalent of Star Trek IV (I have faith in him — his movies have always been entertaining, he's clearly a bright, insightful person and loves Star Trek).

And yet, still, Star Trek movies are not what most consider the heart & soul of Star Trek. It needs to return to the format that made it what it was in the first place: episodic television. Not because TV is superior. But because a multi-hour series allows the show to slowly introduce you to the wonderful world-building that Star Trek is so great at — all of the amazing technology, interesting civilizations, bizarre lifeforms and strange new worlds. As good as the movies are, they don't have the time to reveal these things to the audience.

But most importantly, like any good TV series, the characters get time to reveal themselves, grow and change. We see them in quiet times and in crisis. We learn their quirks and idiosyncrasies. We see how they behave in all different situations. We get to know them, understand them, feel for them. They become important to us. And Star Trek, as much as it's been about sci-fi, space opera and action/adventure — has always been about the characters when it's at its best.

What format?
Episodic TV has come so far, even since The Next Generation. On my website, I propose a 10-13 episode premium cable format series along the lines of a Mad Men, Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, or the new Daredevil series on Netflix. I see the amazing potential for Star Trek if that premium, quality-over-quantity model was applied to it. Imagine the deep storytelling, compelling narratives and character growth that you could get out of a show like Star Trek when approached with modern storytelling techniques. It could be the greatest Star Trek ever. That's my hope, and that was my goal with my proposal: to bring Trek into the modern era of TV.

While CBS owns the rights to produce a new Star Trek series, there's no reason it couldn't air on a premium cable channel like Showtime (in the same corporate family as CBS). In fact, a premium cable Star Trek series might be freed from the restraints of the 4-act format, 42-minute running times, a budget stretched thin over 23 episodes and commercial sponsorship. These days there are new options, such as Netflix series or Amazon.

Why now?
Star Trek has been off the air for 10 years. It is true that almost 20 years passed between TOS and TNG, but keep in mind that TMP was originally going to be a series called Star Trek: Phase II, which began production in 1977. If no new Star Trek series is in the works already, this is certainly the longest time that TV Star Trek has lain completely dormant.

The 50th anniversary of Star Trek is coming up. That's half a century of mind-expanding science fiction on TV and film! What better time to both celebrate what it has meant to all of us — while at the same time giving it a rebirth and launching it into the future with a new focus, a new mission and a new outlook on the very different world we live in today?

Why Star Trek Beyond?
Star Trek Beyond is an attempt to revitalize a vision that Roddenberry had, modernized for the 21st century. With a new format, new technology, a new crew and a new mission. I've been working on this concept for 20 years, revising and polishing the concept, continually updating it as the years passed. All the while, I tried to keep the core values of Good Trek in mind:

Interesting, diverse characters who interact and grow
A progressive, optimistic view of the future
The thrill of discovery, the adventure of the unknown
Space exploration
High concept sci-fi, but with a respect for and grounding in real science
Cutting-edge technology

Star Trek Beyond is set several decades after the time of Captain Kirk. Starfleet is more diverse than it has ever been, with people from over 1,000 member worlds serving in active duty. It is a time of relative peace, the "Pax Galactica". There have been no major wars for 20 years. Much of the Galaxy has been explored and Starfleet is largely a policing force.

But unknown to most, a mysterious signal was received 20 years ago — from the Andromeda Galaxy. A new Enterprise with a new generation of explorers are sent to answer the call, in person.

Here are some key elements of my concept:

Diversity
The diversity in the crew is designed to allow for stories that can comment on our modern world of ethnic, cultural and gender diversity, of always-on connectivity, of escapism, of stress and overworking and of inequality and prejudice. For the first time, Star Trek would have a balance of male and female characters as well as some sorely needed genderqueer characters. Characters of all races, cultures and variations (both Human and alien) that would reflect our modern world and the issues we face today, like classic Trek did in its time. One of the best decisions TNG made was to add Worf. To take a species that had been the "other", a one-dimensional aggressive enemy, and make them a friend. By making Worf a protagonist, we got to see the depth of the Klingon psyche and come to understand them. We came to see how they are really a part of us. The Klingons became the Vulcans of TNG. By bringing diversity to "Star Trek Beyond", it adds diversity to our own self-image.



Rebirth
It is easy to be very pessimistic about the future. The economy is depressed, jobs are still difficult to come by, there is still much prejudice and conflict in the world and we even seem to have given up on space, itself. It's been a very difficult 10-15 years where we've been turned inward as a people, instinctively, protectively. I believe we need to be optimistic about the future; we need to return to lofty goals, great dreams and reach for the stars, both figuratively and literally. The crew of Star Trek Beyond will rise to the occasion, face the unknown and venture into a whole new galaxy in search of answers. We get to see a real frontier story, reminiscent of TOS. It will take Trek in a new but familiar direction, let it grow, let it build off of what came before, and let it recapture some of its original "wagon train to the stars" spirit.



Test render of an Enterprise concept by AdamKop of DeviantArt based on a 20-year-old sketch I sent him

Modern Storytelling
One major approach that could help revive Star Trek is to present its stories in a more modern way. The best shows nowadays tell their stories in a more naturalistic format, with less expository dialogue and more reliance on acting and directing to convey subtext ("show, don't tell"). Stories don't all wrap up nice & neatly, with everything back to normal by the end of an episode. I've designed Star Trek Beyond in this way: there's a theme to each season of 13 high-quality episodes and stories are told in long arcs with overlapping subplots, mysteries and character arcs.


A monster from the Pathfinder RPG. I use it on the site as an example of the kind of bizarre intelligent species my crew will find in Andromeda (not just humanoids).

New Technology
Star Trek has many "old" new ideas built into it as part of its legacy — communicators, transporters, replicators, touch screens, warp drive, artificial gravity, etc. My goal is to keep those that still make sense and introduce or update others that seem likely given the direction of modern technology (for example: already our smartphones have far surpassed the PADDs and communicators in previous Star Trek series, so I've jettisoned them for the most part and introduced new technology to replace them that still seems futuristic).

Star Trek Is A Community
At the beginning of this piece, I said this is "my chance". But, really, I think this is our chance, as a fan community, probably the largest, most vocal, most active fan community in the world! We should speak up and be heard; we should let the powers that be know that we want Star Trek back and better than ever! We should let all the stakeholders know that, whatever the obstacles, it will be worth it and Star Trek can be a cultural phenomenon again if it's allowed to be reborn again and run free. It's up to all of us to make this happen: Star Trek has always been made stronger by the passion of its fan community.

As so many of the people who have responded to my concept have said to me, so I say to all of you: "Make it so!"

LINK:
http://trekmovie.com/2015/06/03/star-trek-beyond-fan-creator-makes-his-pitch-for-a-new-series/#more-40560
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bulldogtrekker
Space Sector Admiral


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 1022
Location: Columbia,SC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EXCLUSIVE: Paramount Invites "Star Trek Beyond" Fan Creator to Pitch TV Series
by Kayla Iacovino ,TrekMovie.com



TrekMovie has learned that Michael Gummelt, owner of www.StarTrekUncharted.com (formerly www.StarTrekBeyond.com) and creator of the fan concept of the same name has been invited by Paramount to pitch his idea for a new Star Trek television series to the network, an unprecedented opportunity rarely (if ever) afforded to non-industry professionals. The concept, now titled Star Trek Uncharted, has been in the works for 20 years and takes place several decades after the time of Captain Kirk and the original Enterprise.

A fan pitch makes it to the Paramount execs
Many fan creators, writers, artists, and the like dream of one day actually sitting down with a big network and pitching their idea. It's the first step that's needed to turn an idea for a show or movie into a reality. But production companies don't traditionally take unsolicited ideas from its fans or they'd spend all their time reading half-baked treatments, many of which would probably only appeal to a very small fragment of the fan community.

Well, this time it's different! For some reason, the powers that be have agreed to listen to Michael Gummelt as he pitches his idea for a new Star Trek series, Star Trek Uncharted. Gummelt penned an essay for TrekMovie on why now is the time for Trek to return to TV and why Star Trek Uncharted is the series to do that. He has also extensively detailed the concept on his website, www.StarTrekUncharted.com. TrekMovie got a chance to ask Gummelt about the unique opportunity.


Quote:
I can now officially announce that I do, indeed, have an invitation to come pitch Star Trek Uncharted at Paramount this summer! As far as I know, this is the first time a fan (not an established industry insider) has been invited to pitch a Star Trek TV series. This is, obviously, extremely exciting and I'm doing my best to get support for it from industry professionals. One of my concept cast members has read the script and expressed interest in supporting it, which is fantastic!


TrekMovie.com:
As far as we know, Paramount has never listened to a fan pitch before. Why you? What makes your concept so special that you were able to get your foot in the door?


Quote:
I think when the rumors of the naming coincidence came out, Paramount saw my website and the passion I had for Star Trek and the idea of it returning to TV, and for my specific concept. I think they felt I would gladly jump at an opportunity to come in and pitch it — which, of course, I did! I'm not under any illusions about my chances (and I realize CBS has the rights to produce any new Star Trek TV series), but it's a chance of a lifetime and I have nothing to lose. I have a great job and a great life, so why not take the chance? I was a film school student before getting my job at Raven Software. I literally just emptied my dorm room into my car and just left my classes (and my TA job) to go to Raven. Getting to write Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force was a fantastic opportunity I never expected to get. And now, having been an aspiring filmmaker and lifelong Trek and sci-fi fan, this pitch opportunity is a dream come true. So I plan on making the most of this opportunity!


TrekMovie:
Is the story set in the prime or neu-Trek universe? Will there be any crossover with the film franchise, a la Marvel's cinematic universe?

Gummelt:

Quote:
This concept has gone through a lot of different incarnations over the past 20 years since I first started working on it. But the way I look at it now is: it should, first and foremost, be a show that can stand on its own. It shouldn't rely too heavily on any deep, intimate knowledge of every past Trek show and movie. It would be very tempting to put in all sorts of references and trivia that only fans like me would get. But for Trek to return to TV after so long, it needs to be reinvented for a new generation. Not a reboot, that's already being done in the movies. What I want for this series is for it to be the future — a Star Trek TV series that feels modern and feels futuristic relative to our current times. So, as I see it, "Star Trek Uncharted" is set sometime in the future, distant enough that it doesn't really matter which universe it takes place in. It's universe-agnostic. In my fantasy world where the series actually gets made, it would need to establish itself as its own show, with its own identity. Only once it's accomplished that would it need to establish its place in the lore. In any case, I imagine it would be up to Paramount, CBS and Bad Robot to decide if they wanted to use it as a "shared universe" show along the lines of Agents of SHIELD.

TrekMovie:
Why have you changed the name from Star Trek Beyond to Star Trek Uncharted?

Gummelt:


Quote:
Well, I loved the title "Star Trek Beyond" and what that evoked in terms of the mission of both the show and the Enterprise, itself. That's why I picked that name out of the hundred name ideas I had back when I wrote all this up last year. But when the rumors came out that Paramount might name the next movie the same thing, I knew I would need to change it to avoid confusion. I went back to my list and one of them just really jumped out at me that I hadn't really given much serious thought to. "Star Trek Uncharted" really gets at the essential mission of the new Enterprise — to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations. to boldly go, and so on. To bring back that frontier "wagon train to the stars" spirit of the original series. A real journey into the unknown. But I also think it describes well the goal of the show: to bring Trek back to TV in a way it's never been done (as a modern, premium cable format series with a modern dramatic structure) and to touch on current themes, sociopolitical topics and new sci-fi ideas that Trek hasn't been able to address for the past 10 years. My vision for the series would be to take Star Trek into uncharted waters in several different ways.


LINK:
http://trekmovie.com/2015/06/18/paramount-acquires-startrekbeyond-com-invites-star-trek-beyond-fan-creator-to-pitch-tv-series/#more-40611
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)


Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17558
Location: North Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is very encouraging. I'm sure we all hope this will work out.

I wonder if the show really will be about yet another ship named "Enterprise". The name isn't really important, of course, and I thought we sort of knew about all the ships named Enterprise right up through TNG.

But, as I said, that's not really important. I'm pulling for this guy and his pitch to the executives.

_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958)


Last edited by Bud Brewster on Fri Jul 08, 2022 12:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
orzel-w
Galactic Ambassador


Joined: 19 Sep 2014
Posts: 1868

PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I ain't interested unless they get the original TOS cast members.



Oh, wait... Rolling Eyes

_________________
...or not...

WayneO
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    ALL SCI-FI Forum Index -> Star Trek on Television All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group