 |
ALL SCI-FI
The place to “find your people”.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Rate "Rocketship X-M (1950)" |
| Ten |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Nine |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Eight |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Seven |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
| Six |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
| Five |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Four |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Three |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| Two |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| One |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Krel
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 3:29 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Bud Brewster wrote: | ~ The film was originally to have been entitled "None Came Back", but writer-producer-director Kurt Neumann changed it to "Rocketship X-M" because the initial title gave away the film's ending.
Note from me: I gotta agree — that title sucks, for exactly the reason named above. |
Also it's a really HUGE spoiler. 
David. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bud Brewster
Galactic Fleet Admiral (site admin)
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 17115
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
________________________________
Ummm . . . you're absolutely right, David!
I was pretty sure the phrase, "because the initial title gave away the film's ending," meant exactly what you said.
_________________
____________
Is there no man on Earth who has the wisdom and innocence of a child?
~ The Space Children (1958) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krel
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just call me Captain Obvious.
David. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
